California Supreme Court to review legality of Bay Area bridge toll hikes

In a case that could decide whether $4.5 billion will be used to improve regional transportation options, the California Supreme Court this week agreed to take up a challenge from taxpayer advocates on whether a $3 toll hike on Bay Area bridges is legal.

The case, which affects tolls on seven state-owned bridges, including the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge, is being closely watched by both government officials and transit activists. At its core is whether the toll hike required a two-thirds majority approval by voters in the nine-county Bay Area to pass rather than a simple majority.

Placed on the ballot by the state Legislature in 2017 and approved by 55% of Bay Area voters in 2018, Regional Measure 3 increases tolls on the seven state-owned bridges by $3 between 2019 and 2025. The next $1 toll increase is set to take effect in January 2022. The final increase is slated for January 2025.

Cars roll through the toll plaza of the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge in Richmond on Thursday, Oct. 15, 2020. (Alan Dep/Marin Independent Journal) 

Officials from the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, which manages the bridge tolls and revenues, said they were disappointed by the court’s decision to take up the case, but not surprised.

“What is unfortunate, really, is that we may be held in this limbo and having to escrow these funds for another year or longer,” MTC spokesman John Goodwin said.

About $200 million in toll revenues collected from the measure so far have been held in escrow ever since the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association and Oakland resident Randall Whitney filed their challenges against the measure in the San Francisco Superior Court in 2018.

  Petaluma police arrest San Pablo man accused of vehicle assault of firefighter

If the measure is upheld, MTC plans to use the toll revenues to fund a variety of projects throughout the region including transit expansion, express lanes, sea-level rise adaptation and traffic relief among others.

These include a $135 million project to build a direct connector from northbound Highway 101 in Marin County to the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge; completion of the Highway 101 widening project in Marin and Sonoma counties known as the Marin-Sonoma Narrows; a $325 million project to extend BART train service further into Santa Clara County; and a $300 million expansion of express toll lanes in Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, Santa Clara, San Francisco and Solano counties.

Currently, the state charges a minimum $6 toll for the Antioch, Benicia-Martinez, Carquinez, Dumbarton, Richmond-San Rafael, and San Mateo-Hayward bridges and between $5-$7 for the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge depending on the vehicle type and time of day. The Golden Gate Bridge is not affected by the measure as its tolls are managed by a separate district.

The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association argues the tolls are a special tax and not a fee because the revenue would disproportionately benefit people who use other modes of transportation, such as transit, and not the motorists paying the tolls.

Opponents of the measure argue upholding the toll hikes could set a precedent for how the courts interpret Proposition 26, the 2010 ballot initiative that broadened the definition of …read more

Source:: The Mercury News – Entertainment

      

(Visited 1 times, 1 visits today)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *