Miss Manners: We told her we don’t need charity. She gave us a big check anyway.

DEAR MISS MANNERS: Our preacher’s wife offered to contribute money to our household grocery budget. We live fairly comfortably on our combined Social Security checks, plus a nice little pension. I thanked her and told her truthfully that we have everything we need.

In this morning’s mail, we received a check for $500. She wrote in a note that another friend had given her the money to pass on to us, just for the fun of doing an anonymous good deed.

Of course, we will immediately send a thank-you note back to the intermediary. Is there anything else we can do? This is just shrimp instead of mac and cheese, but it is a lot of money.

Related Articles

Miss Manners: I can’t believe her behavior at the movies

Miss Manners: My boyfriend yells my name in the most embarrassing places. Am I overreacting?

Miss Manners: She won’t honor the family plan concerning grandmother’s jewelry

Miss Manners: I had to edit my grandchild’s birth announcement to make it less offensive

Miss Manners: You’re eloping? Do you know what that means?

GENTLE READER: You can enclose the unendorsed check with your letter of thanks, asking that the money be given to someone truly in need. Why shouldn’t you, too, have the fun of doing a good deed?

That charity is noble does not mean that it should be pressed on those who have declined it. Doing so makes Miss Manners suspicious that the purpose was not to do good, but only to be able to feel good.

DEAR MISS MANNERS: I’m never likely to meet Elizabeth II, but if I do, how would I be expected to act? I assume there would be someone there to give me protocol tips, but I am curious.

  Super Micro expands north San Jose campus with new manufacturing building

As a citizen of the United States, I assume I wouldn’t curtsy (and if I were male, wouldn’t bow), but would I slightly incline my head?

GENTLE READER: You would be amazed at the number of Americans who are so ignorant of our history as to believe that we still owe this symbolic obedience to the British monarch. Did they miss the class when the outcome of the American Revolution was taught?

You are correct that if you are in a receiving line on the queen’s home territories, you will receive murmured instructions from an equerry about the behavior expected. Not about curtsying or bowing — which the helpful official will know applies only to the queen’s subjects — but about refraining from touching her and not speaking to her unless she speaks first.

Miss Manners would hope that Americans would not grab strangers even if they are not heads of …read more

Source:: The Mercury News – Entertainment


(Visited 3 times, 1 visits today)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *