Right to bear arms defined
in the context of a militia
In his letter titled “Is free speech a right only if petitioning government?” (Letter to the editor, Mercurynews.com, Jan. 9), the letter-writer argues that if a well-regulated militia limits the ownership of arms, it could equally be argued that the right to free speech is limited to petitioning government.
This argument is specious because while the right to bear arms is defined in the context of a well-regulated militia, the right to free speech is not defined in the context of petitioning government.
The letter-writer further states: “Stay in your lane and out of constitutional law.”
Letter: We who live in Oakland doing fine without the critics
Letter: Obama hailed for Bin Laden killing but still didn’t win war
Letter: Women are never told cosmetics can be this dangerous
Letter: Iran may expose Trump’s taxes and Ukraine evidence
Letter: So if an owner isn’t using something, we can use it?
Sorry, the Constitution is the lawful democratic purview of every U.S. citizen. Nobody has the right to tell citizens to stay out. And we won’t.
Los Altos Hills
Submit your letter to the editor via this form
Read more Letters to the Editor
Source:: The Mercury News – Politics