The winner of Tuesday night’s Democratic primary debate was Sen. Amy Klobuchar (Minn.). I can say this without hesitation because, with the exception of one somewhat embarrassing memory lapse, she spoke with the most confidence and clarity to the widest number of possible primary voters, not least in Iowa.
Klobuchar will not receive the credit she deserves in large because her performance was not meant to appeal to the vast majority of people commenting on these debates. The question is not whether I and my colleagues find Klobuchar likeable. (Personally she reminds me of a mean-spirited elementary-school librarian who is about to remind us for the fifth time to use our indoor voices.) It is whether she appeals to moderate Democrats who think that former Vice President Joe Biden is too old to run for (much less serve as) president, which is to say, the most important segment of the Democratic primary electorate. Earnest progressives who want Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) or nothing made up their minds years ago. Even if one imagines that half of Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s (D-Mass.) current base of support would name Sanders as their second choice, we are left with roughly 80 percent of likely primary voters trying to decide which moderate candidate is the most electable. These are the people who reliably show up at the polls and support the party financially. They do not vote their conscience and go third party when they do not get their way, nor do they swing for Republicans.
The appeal of Klobuchar is essentially conservative, even Burkean. What she offers is not a dream solution to problems like the cost of health care or university education or the mess we have made of our foreign policy, but something that she thinks will sound reasonable. She accepts the reality of bad decisions that have been made in the past and hopes to prevent future ones by way of incremental improvements. This is why she rejects single-payer despite her willingness to acknowledge the shortcomings of the Affordable Care Act, why she insists on maintaining some American troops in Iraq even though she says that the war was a mistake, and why she rejects the Green New Deal without denying the threat of anthropogenic climate change. It is also why she was the only person on the stage Tuesday night who mentioned the federal deficit even once. She identifies herself as someone who stands in between the “extremes of our politics,” a no-nonsense, commonsensical go-getter who will do her best for everyone — so long as they are willing to compromise. She adds to this an intriguing background, folksy charm, and an admirable fighting spirit (she more or less tied with Warren for second place in speaking time).
I and many enthusiasts on either end of the political spectrum find this position loathsome. But believe it or not, there are millions of Americans who feel this way, who think that marginally improving the lives of their fellows should not come at the …read more
Source:: The Week – Politics