The FCC is examining whether to roll back Section 230 laws that protect social media firms, drawing fire for being Trump’s ‘puppet’

FILE PHOTO: Ajit Pai, chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, speaks at the WSJTECH Live conference in Laguna Beach, California, U.S., October 21, 2019. REUTERS/Mike Blake

Summary List Placement

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is re-examining the part of US law that lets tech companies decide what people are allowed to say on their platforms, acting on demands from President Donald Trump and both Republican and Democrat lawmakers.

FCC Chairman Ajit Pai announced Thursday the Commission would “clarify the meaning” of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996. 

Section 230 offers two main legal shields to tech companies: It gives them power to moderate the content that appears on their platforms, and protects them from liability for illegal content posted by users.

“Members of all three branches of the federal government have expressed concerns about the prevailing interpretation of the immunity set forth in Section 230 of the Communications Act. There is bipartisan support in Congress to reform the law,” Pai said in a statement.

Both Democrat and Republican lawmakers have called for reforms to Section 230, though for very different reasons.

Republicans, including Trump, have argued Section 230 allows tech companies like Facebook to censor lawful speech and target conservatives.

Democrats, including presidential candidate Joe Biden, take issue with the protection from legal liability for harmful content that flourishes on social media platforms.

Pai: ‘Many advance an overly broad interpretation’ of Section 230

Pai said that his decision to clarify Section 230 was in part prompted by Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, who on Tuesday wrote that the prevailing interpretation of the law didn’t match with what’s laid out in the text.

  Shopify sellers can now boost their businesses more easily on TikTok (SHOP)

Pai said that “as elected officials consider whether to change the law, the question remains: What does Section 230 currently mean?”

“Many advance an overly broad interpretation that in some cases shields social media companies from consumer protection laws in a way that has no basis in the text of Section 230,” he said.

“The Commission’s General Counsel has informed me that the FCC has the legal authority to interpret Section 230. Consistent with this advice, I intend to move forward with a rulemaking to clarify its meaning.

“Social media companies have a First Amendment right to free speech. But they do not have a First Amendment right to a special immunity denied to other media outlets, such as newspapers and broadcasters,” he added.

Trump has been trying to get Section 230 revoked.

The president signed an executive order in May targeting Section 230, two days after Twitter placed fact-checking labels on two of his tweets.

He again railed against the law on Wednesday, calling for Section 230 to be revoked after Twitter and Facebook limited the spread of a dubious New York Post story about Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden.

Speaking at a campaign event in Greenville, North Carolina on Thursday, Trump claimed big tech companies conspire with mainstream media outlets against him. “If Big Tech persists in coordination with the mainstream media, we must immediately strip them of their Section 230 protections,” Trump said.

Following the executive order, the Department of Justice in September submitted proposed legislation to Congress to alter Section 230. Trump has also been trying to stack the …read more

  The glitz of 'entrepreneurship porn' leads startup founders to make fatal business mistakes. Here's how to avoid them.

Source:: Businessinsider – Tech

      

(Visited 1 times, 1 visits today)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *